Waiting time targets – like happiness – are best pursued indirectly
It sounds sensible to book patients in before they breach the target. But in practice it is unfair, unsafe, and keeps waiting times on the brink of failure. There is a better way.
Waiting times are a function of two things: the size of the waiting list, and the order in which patients are scheduled. You have to do both to sustain the waiting times targets, and they are best managed separately.
This sounds uncontroversial but it has profound implications for management. Staff who schedule patients should only be judged by how well they schedule. They should not be judged by whether the access targets were achieved, because that is not within their control – the target might be breached because the waiting list is too large, which is a capacity planning issue not a scheduling one.
Gooroo Planner helps directly with both aspects of waiting times management. It shows visually whether patient scheduling is safe and fair for all patients, and how it can be improved. It also plans the waiting time and capacity trajectories that are needed through the year to achieve your objectives. So everybody can see what they need to do, and how close they are to achieving it, without treading on each others’ toes.
It sounds sensible to book patients in before they breach the target. But in practice it is unfair, unsafe, and keeps waiting times on the brink of failure. There is a better way.
Creating a new system for waiting list management will help trusts nail their waiting times targets
Now you can edit week-by-week activity directly in the Profiling screen, and watch waiting times rise and fall as you work. This and other goodies in the latest upgrade.